Which claim is not defensible? A. The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist. B. The government works better when the president and the majority of Congress are from the same party. C. The nation's debt generally rises during times of war. D. Decreasing taxes on middle-class citizens improves the U. S. economy.

Question

Bradyn Braun

Social Studies

24 November, 20:42

Which claim is not defensible? A. The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist. B. The government works better when the president and the majority of Congress are from the same party. C. The nation's debt generally rises during times of war. D. Decreasing taxes on middle-class citizens improves the U. S. economy.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Landen Farmer · Answer 1

A, the world would be better off without political boundaries

Explanation:

Political boundaries are necessary to keep peace and stability in the world. There are many political systems and each one of them is applicable to a specific country only. A political boundary protects a country in case of an invasion and guarantees law protection of its citizens. Any kind of authority needs a a boundary to execute its power, to provide adequate justice and law enforcement. The boundary limits the country's political power and makes sure the power is not abused by restricting it to be applied within the borders.