Ask Question
26 January, 07:33

AOL, LLC, mistakenly made public the personal information of 650,000 of its members. The members filed a suit in California, alleging violations of federal law and California state law. The member agreement between AOL and its members included a provision declaring Virginia as the location of any court dispute. AOL asked the court to dismiss the suit on the basis of that "forum-selection" clause in its member agreement. Under a previous decision of the United States Supreme Court, a forum-selection clause is unenforceable "if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought." California courts previously have declared in other cases that clauses similar to the AOL clause contravene a strong public policy.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 26 January, 07:49
    0
    The question above represents an example of a case.

    Explanation:

    The question above shows an example of a case. One case is a judicial process, where a situation of discrepancy has been established between two people, two entities, or between entities and people (as shown in the question above), where it will be necessary to review laws so that a judge can make decisions around this discrepancy, allowing the injured to be compensated.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “AOL, LLC, mistakenly made public the personal information of 650,000 of its members. The members filed a suit in California, alleging ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers