One of the results of the Schenck decision was that it removed protections for speech intended to cause panic or harm. those serving in the military. those who committed crimes. hate speech.

Question

Barbara Newman

Social Studies

23 January, 13:41

One of the results of the Schenck decision was that it removed protections for speech intended to cause panic or harm. those serving in the military. those who committed crimes. hate speech.

+5

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Javier Downs · Answer 1

Speech intended to cause panic or harm

Lilia Manning · Answer 2

I believe the answer is: Speech intended to cause panic or harm

For example, when a group of people banded up together and peacefully protest a legislation, this action would be protected by the first amendment.

But, when the group of people started to threaten to blow up the white house, then this action is considered as hate speech and would not be protected under the first amendment.