Which of the following answer choices would BEST describe the effect of the "three-fifths formula"?

Question 22 options:

A)

Despite its goal to expand the power of slave states, it did not legitimize slavery in the Constitution.

B)

Although it did not change the status of slavery in the country, it offered slaves partial representation in Congress.

C)

Because it increased representation in slave states, it ensured the Constitution's support in southern states.

D)

Since it reduced the power of slave states, it strengthened the Constitution's ability to deal with slavery at a later date.

Three-fifths formula could be best described as that although it did not change the status of slavery in the country, it offered slaves partial representation in Congress.

Answer : Option B

Explanation:

The three - fifth formula is the formula of representation of slaves into the Congress for the benefit of those who used to held slaves. The Southerners were the slave holding state and they wanted that each slave would be given a representation of three - fifth of a white person in the Congress.

With this, northerners feared that the southerners would become more politically representative and strong. Their fear in the end do come true as the representation of slaves with the said formula made them more balance in the Congress. Although it did not change the slave status.

The statement that would best describe the effect of the 'three-fifths formula' is because it increased representation in slave states, it ensured the Constitution's support in southern states.

Explanation:

The three-fifths formula was first constituted during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 which was held in Philadelphia. This formula was applied as a compromise that was done between the southern and the northern states. The compromise allowed the southern states to count three-fifths of its total slave population in the population of states in order to get more representation on the United States Congress.