Although American artists are largely protected from direct censorship by the U. S. Constitution's first amendment, government funding is subject to approval by local and national legislators who sometimes balk at funding the work of certain artists.

True or False?

Question

Dominic Booker

Social Studies

10 May, 12:02

Although American artists are largely protected from direct censorship by the U. S. Constitution's first amendment, government funding is subject to approval by local and national legislators who sometimes balk at funding the work of certain artists.

True or False?

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Karson Donovan · Answer 1

True.

Explanation:

Right from the beginning, during the framing of the Constitution of the United States of America, the work of arts has been recognized and it has been used and it is still being used in the promotion of family values.

Arts can be used to express one's inner thought and idea. In the United States and many parts of the world, arts are being censored but, in the United States of America, censoring of Arts is limited because of the First Amendment.

Some local and national legislators may not want to fund certain artists maybe because to them it is not morally right and it destroys family values or maybe the artists have violated many laws such as doing works that are defaming.

Hence, the statement given in the question is true.

Although American artists are largely protected from direct censorship by the U. S. Constitution's first amendment, government funding is subject to approval by local and national legislators who sometimes balk at funding the work of certain artists.True or False?

Although American artists are largely protected from direct censorship by the U. S. Constitution's first amendment, government funding is subject to approval by local and national legislators who sometimes balk at funding the work of certain artists.

True or False?