In her speech on chewing tobacco, Catherine made the following argument: To be effective, laws governing chewing tobacco sales to minors must be enforced and must have adequate penalties for people who violate the law. My proposal will significantly increase both enforcement provisions and penalties for violators. Therefore, my plan will be effective. What kind of reasoning did Catherine use?

a. reasoning from principle

b. reasoning from analogy

c. reasoning from specific instances

d. reasoning from expediency

e. reasoning from need

Question

Isabella Oneal

Social Studies

29 July, 03:09

In her speech on chewing tobacco, Catherine made the following argument: To be effective, laws governing chewing tobacco sales to minors must be enforced and must have adequate penalties for people who violate the law. My proposal will significantly increase both enforcement provisions and penalties for violators. Therefore, my plan will be effective. What kind of reasoning did Catherine use?

a. reasoning from principle

b. reasoning from analogy

c. reasoning from specific instances

d. reasoning from expediency

e. reasoning from need

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Lexie Sharp · Answer 1

a. reasoning from principle

Explanation:

Hello! A principle is a base of ideals, foundations, rules and/or policies. In her speech, Catherine defends her proposal and explains the need for the use of the law on people who sell cigarettes to minors, requesting control and broadening her vision of how it should be carried out the idea to reduce the illegal sale.