27 March, 07:53

How does a historian draw conclusions from a chart?

A. By noting the perspective of the chart's author

B. By identifying the relationships between bits of data

C. By locating cause and effect through sequencing

D. By observing how the information in the chart has changed since it's creation

It think it might be B but I'm not sure

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “How does a historian draw conclusions from a chart? A. By noting the perspective of the chart's author B. By identifying the relationships ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

What happened to Ferdinand Magellan

2. Provide a specific, original example in which your desire to be consistent might lead you to change an important, attitude, belief or behavior. Use one of the two major consistency theories about persuasion to explain your example.

Bismarck's belief in practical goals instead of political theory was called realpolitik. True False

To focus on one aspect of a situation and simultaneously exclude all other aspects is called

Research indicates that punishment:

New Questions in Social Studies

The social biology and evolutionary factor for universality of ethnocentrism and prejudice suggests that sentiments about ethnicity and race are logical extensions of kinship sentiment-that is, the favoring of kin over nonkin a) True b) False

Which of the following statements best expresses the relationship between the development of language production and that of language comprehension? a. The development of language production lags behind that of language comprehension. b.

Why was fort ticonderoga an important prize

Alice has misplaced her keys (which rarely happens), but her grandchildren are very worried that something might be wrong with grandma. Never mind that her granddaughter has done the same thing three times this week.

The experiment in which participants first read sentences about a baseball game and were then asked to identify sentences they had seen before