Ask Question
2 January, 16:14

The McDonalds Coffee Case is still one of the most controversial tort cases in recent history. Some felt that the woman should have known that hot coffee posed a risk, while others agreed that McDonalds should have prevented the injury. What do you think? Was Ms. Liebeck more responsible for her injury than the original court decided?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 2 January, 16:27
    0
    Unless she used the hot coffee for self-defense or if it was not purposefully spilled she should have been held more responsible.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The McDonalds Coffee Case is still one of the most controversial tort cases in recent history. Some felt that the woman should have known ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers