Ask Question
30 December, 21:53

One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 30 December, 22:23
    0
    The answer is no, the person who acts in a manner that is very annoying but not threatening can't be liable for the infliction of emotional distress because in order to inflict emotional distress, the person should be threatening and not just plainly annoying towards others.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress. ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers