Ask Question
Social StudiesSocial Studies
2 June, 06:29

What were the arguments for and against directly bombing the death camp Auschwitz?

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 2 June, 06:34
    0
    Killing all the Jews is against and killing the Nazis is for.

    Explanation:

    If they directley bombed Aushwitz they could kill the Nazis and get rid of the concentration camp but then they'd be doing the Nazis job for them as they'd be killing all the Jews in the process.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “What were the arguments for and against directly bombing the death camp Auschwitz? ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What are the four major related to cattle rearing in Africa
Answers (1)
Imagine that you have a roommate who is a slob and you would like to change this behavior. From your knowledge of conditioning principles, how would you encourage and reinforce their behavior?
Answers (1)
Do you think that India will ever return all the lost territory of Nepal?
Answers (1)
Why is Australia considered a Continent?
Answers (2)
Which branch of government do we vote for directly?
Answers (2)
New Questions in Social Studies
Why does it take just a few people to act rationally for the standard model to hold?
Answers (1)
What arguments can be made that exploration was a very important consequence of the printing press
Answers (1)
Selena looks around the room politely and turns slightly away from the speaker instead of simply saying that she is bored of the speaker's rambling and would like to leave.
Answers (1)
How did the pre-war European Jewish population compare with the post-war population?
Answers (1)
How would our world be if civil rights didn't exist?
Answers (1)
Home » Social Studies » What were the arguments for and against directly bombing the death camp Auschwitz?
Sign Up Forgot Password?