How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

Ernesto Miranda was found guilty on all counts.

Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Ernesto Miranda could not be tried twice for the same crime.

Ernesto Miranda did not have the right to avoid self-incrimination.

Question

Finley Nolan

Social Studies

3 August, 13:56

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

Ernesto Miranda was found guilty on all counts.

Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Ernesto Miranda could not be tried twice for the same crime.

Ernesto Miranda did not have the right to avoid self-incrimination.

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Karissa Bates · Answer 1

Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Explanation:

Miranda v. Arizona was an important supreme court case. In the case the supreme court ruled that the court cannot accept the defendant's authorities unless the defendant is informed of their right to have attorney during questioning and told that anything they say will be held against him.

Miranda was arrested for kidnapping a women. The law enforcement official interrogated him, he admitted to the crimes and signed a written confession. when his case went to trial his confession was used against him.

Selena Mathews · Answer 2

the answer is B. Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?Ernesto Miranda was found guilty on all counts.Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.Ernesto Miranda could not be tried twice for the same crime.Ernesto Miranda did not have the right to avoid self-incrimination.

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

Ernesto Miranda was found guilty on all counts.

Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Ernesto Miranda could not be tried twice for the same crime.

Ernesto Miranda did not have the right to avoid self-incrimination.