When michael debellis and his colleagues at the university of pittsburg school of medicine failed to show a statistically significant difference in volume between 44 maltreated children with ptsd and 61 healthy controls what was the significance of the outlier study?

Question

Linda

Social Studies

14 September, 11:58

When michael debellis and his colleagues at the university of pittsburg school of medicine failed to show a statistically significant difference in volume between 44 maltreated children with ptsd and 61 healthy controls what was the significance of the outlier study?

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Aryanna Larson · Answer 1

The significance of the outlier study was to determine why there was such a difference in volume between 44 maltreated children with ptsd and 61 healthy controls. The difference shows the malnutrition was to blame in this case as the 61 healthy controls were not suffering from malnutrition.