29 May, 01:33

Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?

No single branch of government would have too much power.

The president should have more power than the other branches.

Power would be divided equally between federal and state government.

Trying to balance three branches of government would be impossible.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers? No single branch of government would have too much power. The president should have ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

In 1954, the u. s. supreme court ruled that schools must be desegregated, meaning black and white children must attend the same schools instead of being separated.

At an intersection with traffic lights, a yellow arrow showing at the same time as a green traffic light means

If a court makes a ruling based on a previous ruling from another court, this is an example of the principle of:

Eileen smiles wherever she goes. She smiles a lot in the classroom, which in turn prompts her fellow students to smile, making them feel happier too. This effect is best explained by which of the following theories of emotion?

According to hamilton, opponents of the constitution would still allow the federal government to engage in what type of taxation?

New Questions in Social Studies

What percentage of Georgia's imports are handled by the port of Savannah today?

If reinforcement occurs after every sixth response, which schedule of reinforcement is this?

Que funcion cumple el sol en los ciclos biogeoquimicos?

Which of the following statements is not true about genes

Because of (blank) some countries using Euro faced bankruptcy and threatened the value of the euro