Ask Question
8 February, 07:58

The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?

Demands on food resources in Africa increase

Incidents of starvation-related illness decrease

Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers

Other countries follow suit and shifts funds from conservation to food

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 8 February, 08:22
    0
    The answer to your question would be the second statement. I think that the incidents of starvation-related illness decrease would be a potential negative externality for the global environment. In this case, if the Federal government approved additional funding for food resources in Africa.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers