The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?

Demands on food resources in Africa increase

Incidents of starvation-related illness decrease

Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers

Other countries follow suit and shifts funds from conservation to food

Question

Marcelo Burton

Social Studies

8 February, 07:58

The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?

Demands on food resources in Africa increase

Incidents of starvation-related illness decrease

Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers

Other countries follow suit and shifts funds from conservation to food

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Curry · Answer 1

The answer to your question would be the second statement. I think that the incidents of starvation-related illness decrease would be a potential negative externality for the global environment. In this case, if the Federal government approved additional funding for food resources in Africa.