The case of hugo zacchini, the "human cannonball," was an oddity in appropriation law because

a. the plaintiff was not identified in the film.

b. all represented facts were indeed true.

c. the plaintiff was in a public place.

d. the appropriation occurred in a news program.

Question

16 August, 01:57

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Skip · Answer 1

I think the answer is the appropriation occurred in a news program.

The case of hugo zacchini, the "human cannonball," was an oddity in appropriation law becausea. the plaintiff was not identified in the film.b. all represented facts were indeed true.c. the plaintiff was in a public place.d. the appropriation occurred in a news program.