he committee on sexual discrimination in the workplace has highlighted Supremo Company as a chief offender. Of the twenty senior executives in the firm, only one is a woman and of the forty junior executives, only five are female. Supremo could best defend itself against the charges by showing that

All job applicants who were rejected had fewer qualifications than those accepted.

Explanation:

In this example, we learn that Supremo Company has a clear gender inbalance when it comes to its employees. Out of twenty senior executives, only one is a woman, and out of forty junior executives, only five are female. This shows that a lot more men than women are given jobs at the company.

If Supremo wants to defend itself against the charges of sexual discrimination, it has to show that the imbalance is justified based on the qualifications of applicants. This will show that the employees were chosen due to their talent, and not their gender. Therefore, one way to show this would be by demonstrating that all job applicants who were rejected had fewer qualifications than those who were accepted.