Gail Norton began dating Russell Hoyt under the mistaken impression that he was single. She later learned that he was married, but he repeatedly assured her he was getting a divorce. Six years later, Hoyt convinced Norton to quit her job so that they could travel together. He promised that he would "take care of her for life." The couple lived lavishly all over the world. Hoyt rented Norton an apartment, bought her cars, and repeated his promises to divorce his wife and marry her. He did neither. After 23 years, Hoyt ended the relationship with Norton. On what theory could Norton sue Hoyt? Is she likely to win?

Question

Lily Cisneros

Social Studies

31 December, 21:07

Gail Norton began dating Russell Hoyt under the mistaken impression that he was single. She later learned that he was married, but he repeatedly assured her he was getting a divorce. Six years later, Hoyt convinced Norton to quit her job so that they could travel together. He promised that he would "take care of her for life." The couple lived lavishly all over the world. Hoyt rented Norton an apartment, bought her cars, and repeated his promises to divorce his wife and marry her. He did neither. After 23 years, Hoyt ended the relationship with Norton. On what theory could Norton sue Hoyt? Is she likely to win?

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Pacheco · Answer 1

Norton could use promissory estoppel, and yes she is likely to win.

Explanation:

Promissory estoppel refers to a legal case that caused by the failure of one party to fulfill his/her promise to another party that resulted in some sort of detriment to the other party.

From the case above, Hoyt initially lied to Norton about his marital status and also lied about his promise to marry Norton even after convincing her to leaver her job. This will make the case turn in Norton's favor.