VidGames Inc. markets a variety of shooting, fighting, and hunting video games.

A state statue is enacted to require all game makers to label any games with an option to kill something as "excessively violent." A court would likely hold this regulation to be

a. necessary to protect national interests.

b. justified by the need to protect individual rights.

c. an unconstitutional restriction of speech.

d. constitutional under the First Amendment.

Question

Aarav

Social Studies

13 August, 00:34

VidGames Inc. markets a variety of shooting, fighting, and hunting video games.

A state statue is enacted to require all game makers to label any games with an option to kill something as "excessively violent." A court would likely hold this regulation to be

a. necessary to protect national interests.

b. justified by the need to protect individual rights.

c. an unconstitutional restriction of speech.

d. constitutional under the First Amendment.

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Howe · Answer 1

c. an unconstitutional restriction of speech.

Explanation:

Since a state statue is enacted to require the game makers to mark their games having the option to kill as "excessively violent". In the eyes of court this regulation will be regarded as an unconstitutional restriction of speech.

Hence the answer is option c.