Suppose you are a sociologist studying alleged police brutality. construct two arguments, one proposing that you ought to be as objective as possible in your work and the other suggesting that, while striving for accuracy you should take a stand against any injustices which your research may uncover

1.

objectively I find that the corrupt police department not only don't report the faulty officers further down the chain of command but reward them ... public needs to know so justice can be delivered

2.

it's been found that the police department is deeply involved in corruption and brutality on the streets ... if I report this to the media, the resulting chaos will do more damage and perpetuate and justify brutality than has already been done