Which is a pro-election of federal judges argument?
A. When judges are elected they can be biased by party politics.
B. When judges are elected there they can focus more time on reviewing law.
C. Judges are more accountable to the people and what they think is just when they are elected
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which is a pro-election of federal judges argument? A. When judges are elected they can be biased by party politics. B. When judges are ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How does mobile connectivity create more engaging experiences for users? a) Guarding against information overload b) Through the use of interactivity c) By making communication more personal d) By incorporating gamification devices e) By eliminating
Answers (1)
in the early - and-mid-1700's Mary Musgrove served as a diplomat between the british in early savannah and what yamacraw indian chief?
Answers (1)
What is the history of Social Security?
Answers (2)
Which group creates regulations in mixed-market economies?
Answers (1)
A researcher selects a sample of 80 people and records the frequency of participants choosing a low-, moderate-, or high-calorie dessert in a buffet. What are the degrees of freedom for this chi-square goodness-of-fit test?
Answers (1)
New Questions in Social Studies
When a fan has a negative experience at an event, they are more likely to share that experience with others?
Answers (1)
What country is south of Macedonia
Answers (1)
Why did the equal rights amendment fail to pass?
Answers (1)
How does the law of supply say the factory will respond to the increase in the price of blue widgets?
Answers (1)
How do stocks, bonds, and mutual funds differ?
Answers (1)