Felicia carelessly left a campfire before it was completely extinguished. the fire spread through the woods and caused the destruction of a nearby lodge. if felicia liable to the owners of the lodge for the building? is she liable to the lodge owners for the loss of income until the lodge can be restored? is she liable to the people who had reservations for the lodge but whose trips are now ruined?

Question

Nobel

Social Studies

3 March, 10:48

Felicia carelessly left a campfire before it was completely extinguished. the fire spread through the woods and caused the destruction of a nearby lodge. if felicia liable to the owners of the lodge for the building? is she liable to the lodge owners for the loss of income until the lodge can be restored? is she liable to the people who had reservations for the lodge but whose trips are now ruined?

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jolee · Answer 1

Sure she is liable. She caused a fire that damaged property. Just like any other crime she can be held for restitution. Reckless endangerment, destruction of private property, destruction of public property. here in Colorado, a lady started the Hayman fire a few years back. Not only did she receive jail time but was ordered liable for $12,000,000 in damages as well for loss to property owners.