Meryl argues that the situational constraints associated with training in an organization are independent of and do not impact social support. on the other hand, miguel argues that situational constraints have a significant influence on social support. in the context of readiness for training, whose argument is correct and why?

Question

Nicholas Becker

Social Studies

16 April, 06:03

Meryl argues that the situational constraints associated with training in an organization are independent of and do not impact social support. on the other hand, miguel argues that situational constraints have a significant influence on social support. in the context of readiness for training, whose argument is correct and why?

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Bria · Answer 1

I think that Miguel's argument is the right one in light of the fact that an association or organization can empower training just when it has the means to provide training.

Situational restraints are factors which put restrains on the degree to which a behavior, individual characteristics, and inspiration convert into practices and execution for example an absence of materials or breaking down of gear or lack of resources to perform a certain task and so forth.