Relying on systematic order and progression, the 'thinkers' of the time (scientists and philosophers), acknowledged two methods of logical conclusion when making observations. They are? Group of answer choices

Question

Reggie

Social Studies

19 November, 13:35

Relying on systematic order and progression, the 'thinkers' of the time (scientists and philosophers), acknowledged two methods of logical conclusion when making observations. They are? Group of answer choices

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Ford · Answer 1

The correct answer is inductive and deductive logic

Logic studies the syllogism or argument. It has its own forms capable of showing that a conclusion is derived from what was established in the premises or propositions given previously. There are two ways of proceeding when you want to form an argument, they are:

The syllogism or deductive argument is one that proceeds from increasingly universal propositions to particular propositions, providing what we call a demonstration, since its inference (the conclusion is drawn from the premises) is the inclusion of a less extensive term in a larger one extension.

The second type of argument is inductive. This comes from particular propositions or with terms relatively smaller than those in the conclusion, and comes to more universal or more extensive terms.