31 March, 23:56

In response to the critique that some of the accounts of her book On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City are inconsistent, Alice Goffman claims that she was protecting her research subjects by omitting details that could identify them. Goffman argues that her actions were ethical because1. they involved deception. 2. they ensured her subjects' confidentiality. 3. she did not commit any crimes. 4. she was exempt from having to get approval from an institutional review board.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “In response to the critique that some of the accounts of her book On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City are inconsistent, Alice ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Which of the following attracted people to Texas during the 1840s and 1850s? A. expensive lands B. hot temperatures C. large rivers D. county seats

Is sexually active and has had more than one sexual partner. she protects herself from pregnancy by using the contraceptive patch and from stds by requiring that her partner wear a condom?

Write any two causes of corruption.

Under what circumstances would the threat of a veto most likely prevent passage of a given bill

In assessing readiness after an incident is over, and deciding what you want to do differently next time, set goals regarding: a. output, systems issues, logistical factors, and human factors. b.

New Questions in Social Studies

If reinforcement occurs after every sixth response, which schedule of reinforcement is this?

Que funcion cumple el sol en los ciclos biogeoquimicos?

Which of the following statements is not true about genes

Because of (blank) some countries using Euro faced bankruptcy and threatened the value of the euro

Cal is driving a car in which duff is a passenger when an accident occurs. cal and duff are emotionally rattled, but neither is physically hurt. cal is not liable to duff on a negligence theory because