A student who was denied admission to law school brought suit against the school. While the case was ongoing, the student was provisionally admitted. By the time the Court was about to issue its decision, the student was going to graduate soon. The case, DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974), was dismissed because the Court determined the outcome of the case would not affect the student. The Court dismissed the case as Group of answer choices statutory law. lacking standing. judicial activism. moot.

Question

Alondra Blackburn

Social Studies

Today, 08:53

A student who was denied admission to law school brought suit against the school. While the case was ongoing, the student was provisionally admitted. By the time the Court was about to issue its decision, the student was going to graduate soon. The case, DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974), was dismissed because the Court determined the outcome of the case would not affect the student. The Court dismissed the case as Group of answer choices statutory law. lacking standing. judicial activism. moot.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Tess Ochoa · Answer 1

Moot

Explanation:

The reason is that the moot cases are the cases that are filed to fight for the rights are not recognizable by law and are open to discussions. In the case of DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974), the student has filed a petition for defending his right which was not recognized by the law and as a result the court debated for a long time (It was a moot case) and at last the court dismissed the case because the student was near the graduation. And also that the outcome of the case wouldn't affect the student because the right for which he was fighting was not at risk anymore.