Biology

10 July, 08:00

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?

It was found in South Japan

It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago

The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians

It is from the Edicaran Period

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal? It was found in South Japan It is dated from about ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

During which stage of cellular respiration is glucose broken down into two molecules of pyruvic acid?

An irritation of the stomach lining results in: a) ulcer b) gallstones c) hemorrhoids d) appensicittis

What information does rna code for

How is your skeletal system like a factory

Summarize the central ideas of the Iroquois Constitution.

New Questions in Biology

Why is carbon essential to all known life on Earth?

Why are only inherited traits involved in the process of evolution?

What are uses of nuclear power?

What is the ultimate energy source for the producers

Which process is a form of mechanical weathering? A. Hydration B. Carbonation C. Exfoliation D. Oxidation