Emily/red sued document security company, alleging he had suffered injuries to his hands as a result of attempting to fix a jam in one of document security's paper shredders. fred alleged the shredder was defective because it failed to contain warnings regarding the dangers to fingers and hands while attempting to fix jams. in order to succeed, fred will have to show that:c while driving a car manufactured by toyosan, suffered a side impact collision from another driver. despite the fact that toyosan's air bag deployed, emily hit her head against the steering wheel, causing damage to her face and teeth. if emily sued toyosan for strict product liability, the court would likely conclude that:

Question

Lena Wall

Business

26 August, 06:00

Emily/red sued document security company, alleging he had suffered injuries to his hands as a result of attempting to fix a jam in one of document security's paper shredders. fred alleged the shredder was defective because it failed to contain warnings regarding the dangers to fingers and hands while attempting to fix jams. in order to succeed, fred will have to show that:c while driving a car manufactured by toyosan, suffered a side impact collision from another driver. despite the fact that toyosan's air bag deployed, emily hit her head against the steering wheel, causing damage to her face and teeth. if emily sued toyosan for strict product liability, the court would likely conclude that:

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jayda Chen · Answer 1

Emily has no case as Toyosan's safety equipment (the airbag) deployed correctly. The safety equipment is there to save lives and reduce serious injury, not eliminate damage completely. Emily would need to sue the driver that caused the accident.