Which of these is NOT a reason to design quality into processes rather than to find problems later through inspections? a. Some mistakes are likely to reach the customer. b. It costs more to make junk and then remake it. c. The time spent on rework aggravates time pressures that already exist on projects. d. The best inspectors can find every variation and defect

Question

Allen Liu

Business

10 December, 20:10

Which of these is NOT a reason to design quality into processes rather than to find problems later through inspections? a. Some mistakes are likely to reach the customer. b. It costs more to make junk and then remake it. c. The time spent on rework aggravates time pressures that already exist on projects. d. The best inspectors can find every variation and defect

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Trevon · Answer 1

d.

Explanation:

Based on the answers provided it can be said that the choice that is NOT a reason to do this would be that the best inspectors can find every variation and defect. The reason being that just because the inspectors are good at their jobs and can detect any defect does not make it okay, and will cause more problems than solutions in the long run.

Kyle James · Answer 2

The answer would be D, the best inspectors can find every variation and defect.

Explanation:

For example, quality by design is a comprehensive program that begins with understanding user needs and continues through (but does not end with) monitoring customer acceptance. Management tools and processes such as ISO 9000 standards and the Food and Drug Administration Quality System Regulations exist to guide medical device manufacturers in quality practices. The goal is to deliver products acceptable for their intended use. Quality control begins with defining attributes ranging from color to accuracy and precision.