Ask Question
18 December, 22:16

Susan fires her Employee/Agent Martin. They had a disagreement and both decided to part ways. However, Martin had a sour taste in his mouth from the conversation. As a result, Martin approaches Susan's supplier Sam to order more supplies for Susan. Sam has known Martin for three years due to Martin's employment with Susan. Sam is unaware that Martin no longer works for Susan. Sam fills the order and sends the supplies along with an invoice to Susan. Must Susan pay?

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 18 December, 22:20
    0
    in this scenario, susan and sam has not done any wrong things.

    but Martin has manipulated sam to take revenge from susan for firing him.

    so in this case, no susan is not obliged to pay. she can take action against martin and after proving in a court of law about martin's manipulation, he will be liable to pay.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Susan fires her Employee/Agent Martin. They had a disagreement and both decided to part ways. However, Martin had a sour taste in his mouth ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers