Ask Question
7 September, 18:03

When Harriet went away for the summer, Landry, a house painter, painted her house. He had a contract to paint a neighbor’s house but painted Harriet’s house by mistake. When Harriet returned from vacation, Landry billed her for $3,100, which was a fair price for the work. She refused to pay. Landry claimed that she had a quasi-contractual liability for that amount. Was he correct?

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 7 September, 18:27
    0
    No, Because Harriet had no knowledge of the painting for her house, While there was an added benefit. There is no quasi-contract at all.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “When Harriet went away for the summer, Landry, a house painter, painted her house. He had a contract to paint a neighbor’s house but ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers