Opponents of tax reforms intended to raise saving argue that such reforms a. favor those with high income, and that saving may not rise because of the substitution effect. b. favor those with high income, and that saving may not rise because of the income effect. c. favor those with low income, and that saving may not rise because of the substitution effect. d. favor those with low income, and that saving may not rise because of the income effect.

Question

Deshawn Buck

Business

23 May, 19:13

Opponents of tax reforms intended to raise saving argue that such reforms a. favor those with high income, and that saving may not rise because of the substitution effect. b. favor those with high income, and that saving may not rise because of the income effect. c. favor those with low income, and that saving may not rise because of the substitution effect. d. favor those with low income, and that saving may not rise because of the income effect.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Karli Wade · Answer 1

Option B

Explanation:

In simple words, under such tax reforms the government is intending to raise indirect taxes which will lead to higher prices of certain goods and is also declining taxes on savings. Both of these steps will work as an incentive for individuals to save more.

However a big majority of community is stating that this will only lead to more burden on the weaker section due to higher prices of commodities and will eventually result in lower standard of living for certain individuals.