Alain and Brie sign a contract for the sale of Alain's Coffee Café to Brie. The parties intend their written contract to be a final statement of most, but not all, of the terms of their agreement-Alain must first buy the building from Developed Commercial Properties, Inc., after which Alain and Brie will negotiate a price.

Refer to Fact Pattern 16-B1. Brie later disputes some of the provisions of the deal with Alain. If the dispute results in litigation, a court will most likely admit evidence of additional terms that are

a. contradictory. b. clear. c. consistent. d. ambiguous.

Question

Fifi

Business

30 December, 04:16

Alain and Brie sign a contract for the sale of Alain's Coffee Café to Brie. The parties intend their written contract to be a final statement of most, but not all, of the terms of their agreement-Alain must first buy the building from Developed Commercial Properties, Inc., after which Alain and Brie will negotiate a price.

Refer to Fact Pattern 16-B1. Brie later disputes some of the provisions of the deal with Alain. If the dispute results in litigation, a court will most likely admit evidence of additional terms that are

a. contradictory. b. clear. c. consistent. d. ambiguous.

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Trent Harrell · Answer 1

Answer: consistent

Explanation: In simple words consistent in such cases refers to the evidence which can be considered as stable and reliable in the eyes of law.

In the given case, Alain and Brie had written agreement for additional terms hence that will be considered as consistent with the law,.

Hence the correct answer is C.