Saad was an employee at a chemical company called FGR Inc. He noticed that several of the security personnel at FGR allowed tankers to be filled over the legal limit with highly inflammable gases. Saad gathered ample evidence of such instances and presented it to senior management. A few months later, the company had not acted, and Saad contacted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Less than a week later, the company fired Saad. Assuming that Saad had not had disciplinary issues and wanted to file a claim alleging he was wrongfully discharged, what would be the strongest basis for his claim

Question

Noah Roman

Business

2 January, 23:05

Saad was an employee at a chemical company called FGR Inc. He noticed that several of the security personnel at FGR allowed tankers to be filled over the legal limit with highly inflammable gases. Saad gathered ample evidence of such instances and presented it to senior management. A few months later, the company had not acted, and Saad contacted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Less than a week later, the company fired Saad. Assuming that Saad had not had disciplinary issues and wanted to file a claim alleging he was wrongfully discharged, what would be the strongest basis for his claim

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Seth Giles · Answer 1

He was disciplined for doing what the law requires

Explanation:

This is disciplined to say that the law has a strong basis for her argument. As he followed this process, he first presented himself to senior management in the process, and it was only after the inactivity of senior management that he entered the occupational safety and health administration. so correct answer is He was disciplined for doing what the law requires