Which rebuttal would best refute the negative's counterclaim? Standardized test scores are poor indicators of future success. Looking impartially at information about a student should not be considered reckless. There are many other factors besides standardized test scores that indicate future success. High school performance is always the best indicator of a student's future success.

The answer is "There are many other factors besides standardized test scores that indicate future success."

I just answered that question.

Which rebuttal would best refute the negative's counterclaim? There are many other factors besides standardized test scores that indicate future success. Out of the options given, the best response to a negative one regarding success in the future would be "there are many other factors besides standardized test scores that indicate future success". This statement is a great counterclaim because it states that a standardize test score should not be the only option for proving future success that other factors such as ability, work ethic and more should be taken into consideration.