During the 2001 anthrax scare, the U. S. government threatened to disregard Bayer%u2019s patent of ciprofloxacin, the most effective drug to fight anthrax, and license the production of the drug to American drug companies to stockpile the drug in case of an anthrax epidemic. While the policy would lower costs to the U. S. government of stockpiling the drug, it also would have other costs. What are those costs?
Instructions: Select all that apply.
Lost profit by Bayer.
Fewer new drugs invented.
Higher current welfare loss.
Increased sunk costs by drug industry.
+3
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “During the 2001 anthrax scare, the U. S. government threatened to disregard Bayer%u2019s patent of ciprofloxacin, the most effective drug ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Home » Business » During the 2001 anthrax scare, the U. S. government threatened to disregard Bayer%u2019s patent of ciprofloxacin, the most effective drug to fight anthrax, and license the production of the drug to American drug companies to stockpile the drug in