Which best explains why infrared waves are ineffective for treating cancer?
a) They have frequencies that are too high to kill cancer cells.
b) They have short wavelengths, which can be harmful to healthy cells.
c) They do not transfer enough energy to destroy cancer cells.
d) They have long wavelengths, which can be harmful to healthy cells.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which best explains why infrared waves are ineffective for treating cancer? a) They have frequencies that are too high to kill cancer ...” in 📗 Chemistry if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Solutions that can conduct electricity are called.
Answers (1)
Which type of bond is where two atoms are sharing one or more valence electrons?
Answers (1)
Solid gold has a greater density than liquid gold what must happen to the volume of a given mass of solid gold when it becomes a liquid
Answers (1)
A solution of koh required 31.3 ml of 0.118 m hcl to reach neutralization. what mass of koh was in the titrated sample?
Answers (1)
Use 'beta particle' in a sentence.
Answers (1)
New Questions in Chemistry
Which of the following is not a source of air pollution related to human activities
Answers (1)
Objects and substances in motion is I
Answers (1)
If you were to remove an electron from a sodium atom that has eleven protons, what would be the electrical charge of the ion?
Answers (1)
The atomic mass of fluorine in 19.0 amu, so the molar mass is?
Answers (1)
A rod shaped organism with no nucleus commonly found in Garbage will most likely belong to which kingdom
Answers (1)