A scientist in London and a scientist in California both conducted independent investigations that produced similar results. What does this mean about the data that was collected? The findings are considered stronger and more reliable because they were repeated. The scientists will have to compete for the credit for this discovery. The scientific community will vote on the name of any resulting theory, in order to keep things fair. The findings are automatically promoted to a law because they were proven by two different scientists.

Question

Nikolai Weber

Chemistry

9 July, 22:09

A scientist in London and a scientist in California both conducted independent investigations that produced similar results. What does this mean about the data that was collected? The findings are considered stronger and more reliable because they were repeated. The scientists will have to compete for the credit for this discovery. The scientific community will vote on the name of any resulting theory, in order to keep things fair. The findings are automatically promoted to a law because they were proven by two different scientists.

+5

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Chewy · Answer 1

Then the data had to be the same.

Kimora Mercer · Answer 2

A) The findings are considered stronger and more reliable because they were repeated

Explanation:

Because the same thing was experimented twice, and the final result was still the same, it means this is more of a strong and reliable experiment outcome.