Take a look at the following graphic organizer of credible and not credible Internet sources. A 2 column table with 3 rows. Column 1 is labeled Credible with entries w w w dot u s a dot gov, w w w dot harvard dot e d u, w w w dot nasa dot gov. Column 2 is labeled Not Credible with entries w w w dot blogger dot com, w w w dot twitter dot com, w w w dot wikipedia dot com. According to the graphic organizer, which source is not credible?

Question

Royce

English

28 October, 07:18

Take a look at the following graphic organizer of credible and not credible Internet sources. A 2 column table with 3 rows. Column 1 is labeled Credible with entries w w w dot u s a dot gov, w w w dot harvard dot e d u, w w w dot nasa dot gov. Column 2 is labeled Not Credible with entries w w w dot blogger dot com, w w w dot twitter dot com, w w w dot wikipedia dot com. According to the graphic organizer, which source is not credible?

+1

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Samantha Jensen · Answer 1

Dot com websites. Specifically, Wikipedia, Blogger, and Twitter.

All entries under Not Credible are dot com websites

Giovanny Burke · Answer 2

I think that the wiki source would be the least credible out of all of them.

Explanation:

The reason why I think that it is the wiki source is because all the other ones are government websites or school related sites that can be trusted but wiki can be incorrect an outdated. Take wiki how for an example.