Ask Question
28 February, 07:36

Which footnote is formatted correctly? 2Garrow 403-04 tells readers how King knew at the start of the second attempt that he would cut the march short, but did not inform most of the marchers or even all of the leaders of his plan, which led many in the movement to briefly criticize King. 2. see Garrow 403-04 for criticisms of King for cutting the march short 2. For a detailed account of the criticisms King faced for ending the march, see Garrow 403-04. 2For an account of the criticisms King faced for cutting the march short and not sharing his plan with others in the movement, see Garrow, 403-04.

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 28 February, 07:39
    0
    2. For a detailed account of the criticisms King faced for ending the march, see Garrow 403-04.

    This format is the most grammatically correct. It has the clearest and most succinct wording. Also, the end citation is correct. The footnote should end with the source that's being referred to, not begin with it. The correct punctuation is a comma follow by "see", the author's last name (or title, if there is no author) and the page numbers. Options A and B put the reference information first. Option D includes an extra comma that is not needed.
  2. 28 February, 08:00
    0
    2. For a detailed account of the criticisms King faced for ending the march, see Garrow 403-04.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which footnote is formatted correctly? 2Garrow 403-04 tells readers how King knew at the start of the second attempt that he would cut the ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers