A man who lost his arms in a terrorist attack gives an impassioned plea for tougher anti-terrorism laws. Those listening to this speech should wonder A) if the speaker is repressing emotion. B) if the speaker lost any jobs as a result of the attack. C) if the speaker can think objectively about the issue. D) if the speaker's injuries might be even worse than he is letting on.

Question

Daisy

English

31 August, 20:23

A man who lost his arms in a terrorist attack gives an impassioned plea for tougher anti-terrorism laws. Those listening to this speech should wonder A) if the speaker is repressing emotion. B) if the speaker lost any jobs as a result of the attack. C) if the speaker can think objectively about the issue. D) if the speaker's injuries might be even worse than he is letting on.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Hancock · Answer 1

C) if the speaker can think objectively about the issue.

Explanation:

A man who was injured in a terrorist attack is unlikely to be able to be objective about politics and terrorism. He probably feels a strong personal connection with the subject. Moreover, he is likely to think about terrorism in a personal way, and not in a way that addresses the needs of all people. Therefore, the audience should be aware of this fact so that they can more easily spot prejudice or bias in his speech.