English

6 January, 17:19

Which statement is true about independent clauses?

A. They are connected by a coordinating conjunction.

B. They have a subject but do not have a predicate.

C. They do not make complete sense on their own.

D. They are never combined with a dependent clause.

E. They always start with a subordinating conjunction.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which statement is true about independent clauses? A. They are connected by a coordinating conjunction. B. They have a subject but do not ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Select the most plausible reason why Jackson includes the following sentence in "The Morning of June 28, 1948": "I had written the story three weeks before, on a bright June morning when summer seemed to have come at last, with blue skies and warm

Read the sentence below and answer the question that follows. George C. Parker, a con artist from around the 1900s, conned others into buying the Brooklyn Bridge, the Statue of Liberty, Grant's Tomb, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

The rule regarding EDS stowaways is based on

What are the key elements that should be included in an essay that makes a case or in a narrative essay, as well as how you might incorporate these element into the essay?

Which stage follows falling action

New Questions in English

Which statement best describes civil liberties in the U. S. during World War I? A) Freedom of speech was encouraged to show that the U. S. protected freedom.

When taking a test assessment, strive for progress, not for perfection! In this sentence, the word "strive" is being used as what part of speech? adjective action verb subject object of preposition

Part a in "all together now" barbara jordan's main purpose is to?

What is a long narrative poem involving a hero or heroes caled?

S. Weir Mitchell was the "noted specialist in nervous diseases" (para. 4) whom Gilman mentions. Yet she does not identify him by name.