Ask Question
17 September, 16:12

John Ruskin in his essay "Work," claims that doctors value curing the sick more than money, and offers the following reason in support of his claim.

[Doctors] in the whole, desire to cure the sick; and-if they are good doctors, and the choice were fairly put to them - would rather cure their patient and lose their fee than kill him and get it.

Which best evaluates the support Ruskin offers for his claim?

A. it is not logical; the author ignores other possibilities-that the patient is cured and the doctor still gets his fee, for example.

B. it is not logical; the aurthor himself is not a doctor, so he does not have the expertise necessary to qualify his opinion.

C. it is logical; most people don't want to become doctors just for the sake I money

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 17 September, 16:34
    0
    Its A, its illogical whether he cures or he mistakenly kills he gets his pay.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “John Ruskin in his essay "Work," claims that doctors value curing the sick more than money, and offers the following reason in support of ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers