Jeremy write an essay supporting having pizza in the cafeteria. Then he found information showing that some types of pizza are unhealthy. Which statement best describes the difference between Jeremy's first and second essays? He argued that the conflicting information was unreliable. He revised the claim to agree with the conflicting source. He proved that the conflicting information was not important. He adjusted his argument in response to the conflicting information

Question

Roth

English

2 November, 19:34

Jeremy write an essay supporting having pizza in the cafeteria. Then he found information showing that some types of pizza are unhealthy. Which statement best describes the difference between Jeremy's first and second essays? He argued that the conflicting information was unreliable. He revised the claim to agree with the conflicting source. He proved that the conflicting information was not important. He adjusted his argument in response to the conflicting information

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Peck · Answer 1

He argued that the conflicting information was unreliable.

He revised the claim to agree with the conflicting source.

He proved that the conflicting information was not important.

He adjusted his argument in response to the conflicting information.

He adjusted his argument in response to the conflicting information.

Option D.

Explanation:

In the first essay written by Jeremy, he says that pizzas should be provided in the cafeterias of the school so that they can eat what they like to eat and do not waste and throw away their lunch boxes and food.

In the second essay written by Jeremy, he says that pizzas should be given in the cafeterias of the school and to make them healthy, the toppings of the pizzas can be done with the vegetables which are healthy to eat and also liked by them.