In Schenck v. United States (1919), Justice Holmes said that speech can be restricted when

one expresses one's self on public property. Eliminate Reactivate B) presenta un peligro claro y presente a la sociedad. it presents a clear and present danger to society. Eliminate Reactivate C) sugiere el derrocamiento del gobierno de los Estados Unidos. it suggests the overthrow of the United States government. Eliminate Reactivate D) se expresa en la ira, ya sea verbal o no verbal. it is expressed in anger, whether verbally or non-verbally.

Question

Anahi Keller

History

27 July, 10:56

In Schenck v. United States (1919), Justice Holmes said that speech can be restricted when

one expresses one's self on public property. Eliminate Reactivate B) presenta un peligro claro y presente a la sociedad. it presents a clear and present danger to society. Eliminate Reactivate C) sugiere el derrocamiento del gobierno de los Estados Unidos. it suggests the overthrow of the United States government. Eliminate Reactivate D) se expresa en la ira, ya sea verbal o no verbal. it is expressed in anger, whether verbally or non-verbally.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Sexton · Answer 1

The answer is B.

Schenk vs US involves a freedom of speech case in which Schenk encouraged American citizens to avoid the military draft during World War I.

The Supreme Court ruled this was not protected free speech because it provides a clear and present danger to American citizens. The court felt that influencing people to not join the war presented a danger to America’s war effort.