What made the U. S. Supreme Court case of Bush v. Gore in 2000 so unusual? a. This case was not meant to be a precedent. b. It was decided in a 5-4 vote. c. The public interpreted the justices' disagreements as political in nature. d. It involved two former vice presidents. e. The case had far-reaching implications./387356230/test

Question

Danika Gibbs

History

9 January, 01:41

What made the U. S. Supreme Court case of Bush v. Gore in 2000 so unusual? a. This case was not meant to be a precedent. b. It was decided in a 5-4 vote. c. The public interpreted the justices' disagreements as political in nature. d. It involved two former vice presidents. e. The case had far-reaching implications./387356230/test

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Joshua Huffman · Answer 1

The right answer is:

a. This case was not meant to be a precedent.

Explanation:

In its sentence in the case Bush v. Gore of 2000, the US Supreme Court stated that it can't be used as a precedent. After halting the manual recount and hearing the arguments of the parts, the high court voted 7-2 on December 12, 2000, to overturn the Florida court's decision, arguing that various methods and standards of the recount process violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution.