How do Martin Luther King Jr. and Lyndon B. Johnson's references to the Declaration of Independence differ?

A) King believes in the power of the Declaration viewing it as the promise, while Johnson sees it as a failure to society and all that it has attempted.

B). King describes the Declaration as a promise unkept and a victory yet to come, while Johnson sees it as a "proud triumph" that still has room to grow.

Answer: B

Martin Luther King, Jr. while delivering the closing address at the most massive mass-protest demonstration in the history of U. S, which held on August 28, 1963 describes the Declaration of independence as a promise unkept and a victory yet to come; he openly challenged the nation with its failure to honor its promise of equal liberty for all as stated in the declaration.

On the other hand, the 36th President of the United States, Lyndon B. Johnson sees the Declaration of independence as a "proud triumph" because according to him, the declaration forms the foundation for the struggles of men who hunger for freedom. He also opined that the declaration still has room to grow because the founders of the U. S knew that freedom would be secure if and only if each generation would fight to renew and enlarge its meaning.

The answer is A. Selma adds to that view. It not just forgets a significant part of the narrative of how the Voting Rights Act was passed, yet additionally neglects to light up how additionally advance may be made later on. Despite everything we have genuine racial issues in this country. We can just illuminate them by cooperating in view of shared esteems. That is the thing that both Martin Luther King Jr. what's more, Lyndon Baines Johnson comprehended, and that is the reason they both should be associated with their gigantic accomplishments today.