Ask Question
25 April, 03:28

Do you think the permanent distribution of land to former slaves would have made a difference in the outcome of Reconstruction? Why or why not?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 25 April, 03:52
    0
    Yes--it would have given blacks economic security and something to pass on to generations to come.

    No--racism still would have existed and more than likely violence against black land owners would have been rampant.

    Generations of sharecropping and dependence on land owners kept blacks economically behind and never allowed for black farm workers from advancing.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Do you think the permanent distribution of land to former slaves would have made a difference in the outcome of Reconstruction? Why or why ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers