In the civil rights movement, King and his followers refused to obey racial laws that they considered unjust. How does this strategy compare with his recommendation that young men in the United States become conscientious objectors?

Becoming a conscientious objector means opposing a particular law or refusing to fulfill a legal duty based on our conscience and moral values. This can include philosophical principles as well as religious ones. Most of the time, this term is applied to people who refuse to join the armed forces of a country. In the civil rights movement, King and his followers refused obeying laws that they thought were unjust. Therefore, he was also a conscientious objector. The recommendation was most likely guided by his own actions and beliefs.

I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that the first choice is right one. A man has his rights no matter what his race are.