do you agree that "democracy depends upon the widest possible access to uncensored ideas, data, and opinions" explain your reasoning

Yes, I do agree.

Refer below for the explanation.

Explanation:

Democracy relies on an educated, proficient populace whose entrance to data empowers it to take an interest as completely as conceivable in the open existence of their general public and to reprimand impulsive or domineering government authorities or arrangements. Residents and their chosen agents perceive that democracy relies on the most stretched out conceivable access to uncensored thoughts, information, and feelings.

For a free people to administer themselves, they should be allowed to communicate - transparently, openly, and more than once; in discourse and recorded as a hard copy.

The guideline of free discourse ought to be ensured by a democracy's constitution, forestalling the administrative or official parts of government from forcing oversight.

Yes, I agree.

Explanation:

Democracy can be described as a type government that allows all citizens the opportunity to exercise power and civic responsibility either directly or indirectly through representatives that are elected by all the citizens.

Democracy is the institutionalization of freedom, and human rights and freedom are protected by it.

Under democracy, an important recognition is given to the dependence of democracy on unrestricted access to uncensored ideas, data, and opinions.

The foundation of democracy is that a free people mus have open, public and repeated freedom of expression both in speech and in writing in order for them to govern themselves.

Based on my reasoning above, I therefore agree that "democracy depends upon the widest possible access to uncensored ideas, data, and opinions".