Ask Question
28 May, 05:54

Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 28 May, 06:12
    0
    Because they could be biased and strongly opinionated and also the primary source does not have the benefit of hindsight and is therefore not a valid interpretation and less credible
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers